SynchronousObjects » collaboration http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog from dance to data to objects Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:15:37 +0000 en hourly 1 Sync/O Research as Teaching Laboratory http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/06/synco-research-as-teaching-laboratory/ http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/06/synco-research-as-teaching-laboratory/#comments Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:08:53 +0000 admin http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/?p=468 Another great contribution from graduate student Lily Skove:
At the Ohio State University, The Advanced Computing Center for the Arts and Design (ACCAD) is a unique space for the convergence of distinct fields. Perhaps “collision” of distinct fields would be a more apt description, as “convergence” suggests easeful assimilation. Collaboration as collision necessitates the full force of each fields’ identity, traditions, and expertise entangling to create something new, and this is how I would describe ACCAD’s latest conquest, Synchronous Objects for One Flat Thing, reproduced. Working as a student on this project gave me the unique vantage point of observing and engaging experts at work in cross-disciplinary investigation. It is difficult to learn in classroom settings about the nature of collaboration across disciplines, how to set them up, how to guide investigation, create space for distinct expertise and find areas of common ground, and so on. Seeing Synchronous Object’s collaboration in practice and being invited to play an active role in the project’s process, has given me new tools to think about my own research. I think that this project offers a successful model for universities that want to teach their students about how to conduct collaborative research and initiate dialogue across disciplines. It goes without saying that the graduate students on the creative team that made Synchronous Objects achieved a level of intimacy with the project that afforded them new insights and deepened their own learning, but Synchronous Objects created many opportunities for students across the Ohio State University campus to come into contact with the project at various stages of it’s development. For instance, the dance department organized several entry points for the students into this project, such as the “Creative Research Consortium” that explored the project’s themes offering new ideas that were then folded back into the work of the core research team. Currently the architecture department is offering a course that uses Synchronous Objects as a jumping off point for new discovery in their field. As Synchronous Objects circulates in the Ohio State University community, it fosters a desire for new collaborations as people in various fields meet for the first time, and as the departments on campus are re-envisioned not as separate camps of knowledge but as resources for each other. ACCAD offers itself as a meeting place both literally and figuratively on the university map for all of us searching for a collision of interests, and a nurturing environment for hybrid projects.

]]>
http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/06/synco-research-as-teaching-laboratory/feed/ 0
Lillian Skove on re-thinking choreography http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/04/460/ http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/04/460/#comments Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:43:32 +0000 admin http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/?p=460 I have invited collaborators on the project to periodically contribute to the blog describing their roles and interests in relation to Sync/O. This post is written by one of our graduate students in dance and tech, Lillian Skove:

“Engaging with Synchronous Objects as a choreographer, I was very interested in how choreographic thinking is a way of knowing that offers new insight into other fields from geography, to computer programming, to architecture. I was also interested in the ways that other fields shed light on my own choreographic practices and turn my understanding of choreography inside out. In the process of creating I seek to undo what I think I know choreography is so that I can be open to inventive ways of working. Interacting with the Synchronous Objects website is a chance to re-think what choreography is, from a series of actions, to an example of counterpoint, to a study of the responsibilities and dependencies among a group—and the list goes on.

Up-ending my assumptions of what choreography is has several practical consequences that are evident as I create in the studio. Using the Synchronous Objects’ Counterpoint Tool, for instance, invites me to play with new ways of organizing the movement of a group through space or relating my limbs to each other in surprising ways. Synchronous Objects has expanded what choreography can look like and act like, and this alone has had a significant impact on how I think about my choreographic process. From the work of the interdisciplinary team that came together to create Synchronous Objects I come away with an inspiring methodology for collaboration. Congregating around common interests from a variety of angles yields not only insight into each distinct field, but articulates areas where expertise overlaps. What would it mean for my process if I asked an architect or geographer to join in, incorporating their sense of space and place into my work? What would it mean for an architect to consult me on a crowd’s movement through space before she designed an atrium in a hotel lobby? Synchronous Objects invites me to broaden my definition of the choreographic act into other fields, and notice the many ways that actions are organized, be it in the editing room of a filmmaker, or on the drawing board of a city planner. With one foot in the studio, and the other in several diverse disciplines, I feel inspired to jump into making a new piece with the desire to look for choreography everywhere.” —Lillian Skove

We invite your comments and let us know if you’re using the site and if you’d like to contribute a post to the blog.
—Norah

]]>
http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/04/460/feed/ 0
Matthew Lewis on Dance and Computer Science http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/03/matthew-lewis-on-dance-and-computer-science/ http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/03/matthew-lewis-on-dance-and-computer-science/#comments Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:00:10 +0000 MattL http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/?p=158 NORAH: For this e-symposium, could you talk a little about your involvement in the project and your interests as a generative designer and computer scientist?

crumbs-copy

MATT: Sure. As is often the case at ACCAD, many of us served in several roles during different stages of this very interdisciplinary project. Earlier in our process I provided both computer science and generative art and design perspectives as our multidisciplinary team worked to synthesize an understanding of the complex concepts used in Bill’s choreographic approaches in “One Flat Thing, reproduced”. Throughout, I have been able to advise on aspects of our technical development, with respect to both “what is possible and practical” and the inevitable problem solving.

In order to understand and communicate Bill’s concepts and processes (and consider how these could be applied in other fields) we worked to produce qualitative and quantitative data as a step toward investigating Bill’s question, “what else does this look like?” Given the opportunity to explore different ways of visually presenting several aspects of rich source material, I first made use of overhead video of the dance, and then later from the emerging database being constructed to catalog the choreographic events.  I tried to reduce complexity by extracting and displaying individual qualities like gestures, paths, and interactions, and then ultimately applied concepts learned from the project to my own generative systems.

I made use of image processing, computer vision, 3D computer graphics, and interactive online algorithms as different ways of exploring the data. My computer science background was also helpful as we tried to systematically formalize the components and parameters of the abstract systems we are representing. I particularly enjoyed participating in discussions between representatives from different disciplines analyzing shifts from centralized control, to bottom-up complex distributed systems. It has also been fascinating for me to consider Bill’s iterative choreographic processes through a lens of optimization concepts like genetic algorithms and fitness landscapes.

In addition to making choreographic concepts more comprehensible to other disciplines, we are very interested in ways in which choreographic knowledge is useful in other contexts. Exposure to such ideas should provide new ways of seeing, communicating, and evaluating relationships among elements in complex dynamic systems. Having not had much exposure previously to contemporary dance, I now have a much greater awareness of its complexity and breadth of conceptual material.  It’s intriguing to me that I see much richer relationships between dancers and their movements than I had before being introduced to these concepts.

Our design process made me consider that the choreography of attention, combined with disciplinary knowledge, can control what a viewer perceives. More specifically, it seems that new visual relationship concepts might change what can be seen. I’m still contemplating the relationship between what I think of as more “horizontal” alignments, and the more “vertical” processes of reduction and synthesis. As one might hope for in an academic environment, the project’s framework has emphasized this continuous inquiry, instead of seeking a single correct solution. It also has provided a unique model for collaboration between designers, artists, and scientists that should serve as a valuable benchmark for our projects in the future.

—Matthew Lewis, Advanced Computing Center for the Arts and Design (ACCAD)

]]>
http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu/blog/2009/03/matthew-lewis-on-dance-and-computer-science/feed/ 1